Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Versata Software, Inc. et al v. Internet Brands, Inc. f/k/a CarsDirect.com et al, No. 2:08-cv-00313 (E.D. Tex. July 30, 2012)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00313, Dkt. No. 341
Decided
July 30, 2012
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - the Court confirms its prior ruling that the inclusion of nominal damages in the jury instructions and the verdict form was proper
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

During trial held the week of June 11th, 2012, the Court, over objection by the plaintiffs (referred to as “Versata”), permitted the defendants (referred to as “Autodata”) to include a counterclaim for nominal damages stemming from an alleged breach of contract by the plaintiffs. This order is intended to explain the basis for that ruling. I.