Convolve, Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00244 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After a nine-day trial, the jury found that Plaintiff had pr oved that the asserted claims of the ‘473 Patent were infringed. Before the Cour t is Hitachi’s Renewed Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Dkt. No. 571, filed August 19, 2011). APPLICABLE LAW Judgment as a matter of law is appropriate “[ i]f a party has been fully heard on an issue during a jury trial and the court finds that a re asonable jury would not ha ve a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the party on that issu e . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) & (b).