Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Convolve, Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00244 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00244, Dkt. No. 676
Decided
February 11, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Dell’s Re newed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 565, filed August 19, 2 011, the “Motion”) and Dell’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on No Willful Infringement (Dkt. No. 568, filed August 19, 2011, the “Willfulness JMOL”). APPLICABLE LAW Judgment as a matter of law is appropriate “[ i]f a party has been fully heard on an issue during a jury trial and the court finds that a re asonable jury would not ha ve a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the party on that issue .