Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00432 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 15, 2009)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00432, Dkt. No. 238
Decided
September 15, 2009
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER -#230 Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Infringement Contentions is GRANTED
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is P laintiff Performance Pricing, Inc.’s Motion to Amend I nfringement Contentions ( “Motion”) ( Doc. N o. 2 30). D efendants G oogle Inc. a nd A OL LLC ( collectively, “Defendants”) have filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Infringement Contentions (“Response”) (Doc. No. 234). Plaintiff also filed a Reply to the Motion to Amend Infringement Contentions (“Reply”) (Doc. No. 237).