Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00432 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2009)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Pl aintiff Performance Pricing, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Documents regarding Google’s calculation of actual cost per click and Quality Score (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 215). Defendant Google has filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Documents (“Response”) (Doc. No. 228), as well as a Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Documents (“Surreply”) (Doc. No. 233). Plaintiff also filed a Reply to Motion to Compel Documents from Google (“Reply”) (Doc. No. 229).