Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00432 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00432, Dkt. No. 231
Decided
August 13, 2009
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For all the foregoing reasons, the Court construes the disputed claim language in this casein the manner set forth herein. For the ease of reference, the Courts claim interpretations are setforth in a table at…
Length
32 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,978,253 (“the ‘253 patent”). Plaintiff has filed an Opening Claim Construction Brief (“Opening”) (Doc. No. 187) and a Reply Claim Construction Brief (“Reply”) (Doc. No. 198). Defendants have filed a Joint Response Brief on Claim Construction (“Response”) (Doc. No. 192), as well as a Joint Sur-Reply Brief on Claim Construction (“Surreply”) (Doc. No. 207). The Court held a Markman hearing on June 18, 2009. (Doc. No. 209).