Widevine Technologies, Inc. v. Verimatrix, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00321 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 10, 2009)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Verimatrix, Inc.’s (“Verimatrix”) Motion to Compel Production of Documents. [Dkt. No. 97] After considering the parties’ arguments and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that this motion should be DENIED for the reasons set forth below. I. Background Verimatrix moves this Court to compel an update to pr eviously-produced emails. Specifically, Verimatrix requests that Plaintif f Widevine Technologies, Inc.