Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Widevine Technologies, Inc. v. Verimatrix, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00321 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00321, Dkt. No. 66
Decided
September 25, 2008
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - before the court is dfts Motion 19 to stay this action pending inter partes reexamination. For the reasons stated, herein the court denies this motion
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is the defendant’s motion (#19) to stay this action pending inter partes reexamination. For the foregoing reasons, the court denies this motion. 1. Background Widevine Technologies, Incorporated (“Widevine”) filed the instant ca use of a ction on August 1, 2007, alleging that Verimatrix, Incorporated (“Verimatrix”) infringes various claims of U.S. Patent No.