Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Widevine Technologies, Inc. v. Verimatrix, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00321 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 4, 2009)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00321, Dkt. No. 151
Decided
November 4, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 175 and 831 patents. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each other's claim co…
Length
33 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the ar guments of counsel, the Court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction Widevine Technologies, Inc. (“Widevine”) asserts United States Patent Nos. 7,165,175 (“the ‘175 patent”) and 7,376,831 (“the ‘831 patent”) ag ainst Verimatrix, Inc. (“Verimatrix”). Widevine and Verimatrix both provide encryption technology that protects digital media content.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case