Golden Hour Data Systems, Inc. v. emsCharts, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00381 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION The Court conducted a jury tria l in November, 2008. In that trial, the jury rendered a verdict that Defendant emsCharts, Inc. (“emsCha rts”) willfully infringed all the asserted patent claims and awarded $3,500,000 to Plaintiff Golden H our Data Systems, Inc. (“Golden Hour”). See Dkt. No. 202 (Jury Verdict). Importantly, the jury explicitly found that all the asserted patent claims were not invalid by reason of anticip ation or obviousness in vi ew of any of the art presented at trial, including the AeroMed Brochure. See id.