Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Golden Hour Data Systems, Inc. v. emsCharts, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00381 (E.D. Tex. May 12, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00381, Dkt. No. 297
Decided
May 12, 2009
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion for attorneys' fees
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 Before the court is Defendants emsCharts, Inc’s and Softtech, LLC’s Motions for Attorneys’ Fees Based Upon a Determination of an Exceptional Case Under 35 U.S.C. § 285. (Dkt. Nos. 289 & 290). The c ourt has ca refully considered the law a nd submissions of the par ties. The court DENIES the Motions for the reasons expressed below. I. INTRODUCTION AND FACTS In this patent infringement action, Plaintiff Golden Hour Data Systems Inc. (“Golden Hour”) obtained a jury v erdict o f i nfringement a gainst D efendants e msCharts In c.