Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Asus Computer International et al, No. 2:06-cv-00348 (E.D. Tex. June 22, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00348, Dkt. No. 624
Decided
June 22, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - After considering the traditional equitable factors, the Court concludes that LaserDynamics has not shown that a permanent injunction is proper in this case. Thus, the Court DENIES LaserDynamics request for a …
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff LaserDynamics, Inc.’s (“LaserDynamics’”) motion for a permanent injunction. [Dkt. No. 577.] In the a lternative, LaserDynamics moves for the award for post-judgment royalties against QCI. Defendant Quanta Computer, Inc. (“QCI”) opposes the motion. The Court held a full evidentiary hear ing on the issue of a permanent injunction on February 2, 2010. The Court has carefully consider ed the parties’ submissions, the record, and the applicable law.