LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Asus Computer International et al, No. 2:06-cv-00348 (E.D. Tex. June 9, 2010)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Quanta Com puter, Inc.’s (“QCI’s”) motion for new trial and/or remittitur on the issues of damages. [Dkt. No. 592.] The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions, the record, and the a pplicable law. For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND The parties to this case selected a jury on June 1, 2009. The trial commenced on June 30, 2009 and the jury reached its verdict on July 6, 2009. The jury found that defendant QCI infringed claim 3 of U.S. Patent No.