Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Asus Computer International et al, No. 2:06-cv-00348 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00348, Dkt. No. 562
Decided
August 17, 2009
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER finding that the '981 patent is not uneforceable and DENIES Defendants' motion
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION In this case, plaintiff LaserDynamics, Inc. (“LaserDynamics”) obtained a jury verdict of infringement against defendants Quanta Computer , Inc., et al., (collec tively “Quanta”) with respect to claim 3 of United States Patent No. 5,587,981 (“the ‘981 patent”). See Dkt. No. 533 (Jury Verdict). The court conducted a bench trial on August 10, 2009 to resolve Quanta’s defense of inequitable conduct. II.