Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Coopervision, Inc. v. Ciba Vision Corporation, No. 2:06-cv-00149 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2007)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00149, Dkt. No. 149
Decided
August 21, 2007
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 141 Objections to Memorandum and Order Construing Claim Terms of United States Patent Nos. 6,431,706; 6,923,538; 6,467,903; 6,857,740; 6,971,746; 7,133,174; and 7,134,753 filed by CIBA Vision Corporation
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is Defendant CIBA Vision Corporation’s Objections to Memorandum and Order Construing Claim Terms of United States Patent Nos. 6,431,706; 6,923,538; 6,467,903; 6,857,740; 6,971,746; 7,133,174; and 7,134,753 [Doc. # 141 in 2:06cv149 and Doc. #73 in 9:06cv149]. Defendant asks this court to reconsider certain portions of1 Magistrate Judge Earl Hine’s order signed July 16, 2007. See Doc. # 129 in 2:06cv149 and Doc. #71 in 9:06cv149. This is a ruling on a non-dispositive matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 636. Under 28 U.S.C.