Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Coopervision, Inc. v. Ciba Vision Corporation, No. 2:06-cv-00149 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2007)

Granted in Part
Discovery
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00149, Dkt. No. 145
Decided
August 6, 2007
Judge
Earl S. Hines, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION - CIBA's motion is granted to the extend stated in this order but otherwise denied. Motions to compel are denied as moot
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Referred to the undersigned for determination are: (1) CooperVision, Inc.’s Motion to Compel [Doc. # 127], (2) CooperVisions Inc.’s Second Motion to Compel [Doc. # 133] and Defendant CIBA Vision Corp.’s Motion to Compel [Doc. # 126]. I. Nature of Action CooperVision filed suit against CIBA Vision Corporation (“CIBA”) claiming infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,431,706 and 6,923,538 (collectively, “the Edge Design patents”) and of United States Patent Nos.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case