Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Coopervision, Inc. v. Ciba Vision Corporation, No. 2:06-cv-00149 (E.D. Tex. July 16, 2007)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00149, Dkt. No. 129
Decided
July 16, 2007
Judge
Earl S. Hines, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 6,431,706; 6,923,538; 6,467,903; 6,857,740; 6,971,746; 7,133,174; and 7,134,753
Length
33 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 6,431,706; 6,923,538; 6,467,903; 6,857,740; 6,971,746; 7,133,174; and 7,134,753 Plaintiff CooperVision, Inc. (“CooperVision”) filed these actions against Defendant CIBA Vision Corporation (“CIBA”) claiming infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,431,706 and 6,923,538 (collectively, “the Edge Design patents”) and of United States Patent Nos. 6,467,903; 6,857,740; 6,971,746; 7,133,174; and 7,134,753 (collectively, “the Toric patents”).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case