Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tgip, Inc v. AT & T Corporation et al, No. 2:06-cv-00105 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 29, 2007)

Granted in Part
JMOL / Post-Trial Non-Infringement Willfulness Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00105, Dkt. No. 523
Decided
October 29, 2007
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER finding as moot 384 Sealed Patent Motion, granting in part and denying in part 469 Sealed Motion, granting in part and denying in part 472 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, granting in part and denying in part 478 Sealed Motion,…
Length
32 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, Plaintiff, TGIP Inc., claimed infringement of two patents relating to prepaid calling cards. The jury returned a verdict that was adverse in all respects to Defendant, AT&T Corporation, which timely made and renewed motions for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on alternative grounds. [Docs. #469, #472, #478, #479, & #512]. AT&T’s three arguments for JMOL on the issue of noninfringement are summarized as follows: a.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case