Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tgip, Inc v. AT & T Corporation et al, No. 2:06-cv-00105 (E.D. Tex. May 16, 2007)

Granted in Part
Summary Judgment Indefiniteness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00105, Dkt. No. 278
Decided
May 16, 2007
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
Claim 7 of the '768 patent are invalid and 2) Defts have shown that Claim 7 of the '144 patent is invalid
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff TGIP (“TGIP”) filed suit against Defendants AT&T Corp., Bell Atlantic Communications, Verizon Select Services, Inc., MCI Communication Services, Inc., Verizon Business Network Teleconnect Long Distance Services & Systems Company, IDT Corporation, U.S. South Communications, Inc., Interactive Communications International, Inc., Pre Holdings, Inc., and Pre Solutions, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) claiming infringement of United States Patent No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case