Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tgip, Inc v. AT & T Corporation et al, No. 2:06-cv-00105 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2007)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00105, Dkt. No. 238
Decided
March 12, 2007
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER construing claim terms of US Patent no. '114 and '769 - the jury shall be instructed in accordance with the court's interpretation of the disputed clsim terms in the '114 and '768 patents
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 5,511,114 AND NO. 5,721,768 Plaintiff T GIP ( “TGIP”) filed s uit a gainst D efendants AT &T Co rp., B ell A tlantic Communications, Ve rizon S elect Services, I nc., M CI Communication Service s, I nc., Ve rizon Business Network Teleconnect Long Distance Services & Systems Company, IDT Corporation, U.S. South Communications, Inc., Interactive Communications International, Inc., Pre Holdings, Inc., and Pre Solutions, Inc. claiming infringement of United States Patent No.