Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Power-One, Inc., v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.,, No. 2:05-cv-00463 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2008)

Granted in Part
Attorneys' Fees
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00463, Dkt. No. 463
Decided
August 26, 2008
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - grantin in part and denies in part Pltf's Motion to award costs as set forth herein
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Power-One, Inc.’s (“PowerOne”) Motion to Award Costs (Doc. No. 452). PowerOne has also filed a Reply (Doc. No. 458), while Defendant Artyesyn Technologies, Inc., (“Artesyn”) has filed both a Response (Doc. No. 457), and a Surreply (Doc. No. 462). The instant motion presents a number of issues with respect to Plaintiff’s request for an award of costs.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case