Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Power-One, Inc., v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.,, No. 2:05-cv-00463 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 18, 2007)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00463, Dkt. No. 166
Decided
April 18, 2007
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - order denying motion #149 as set forth herein
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Power-One, Inc.’s (“Power-One”) Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld on the Basis of an Alleged Common Interest (Docket No. 149). Having considered the motion and Defendant Artesyn Technologies, Inc.’s (“Artesyn”) response, the Court finds that Power-One’s motion should be DENIED.