Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Power-One, Inc., v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.,, No. 2:05-cv-00463 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 11, 2008)

Granted in Part
Injunction Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00463, Dkt. No. 440
Decided
April 11, 2008
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINIO AND ORDER - for reason cited herein 393 is Granted in Part and Denied in Part. The court will issue a permanent injunction reflecting the findings in this order forthwith
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Power-One, Inc.’s Motion for Entry of a Permanent Injunction Against Artesyn Technologies, Inc., Astec America, Inc., and Emerson Electric Company (Doc. No. 393), and va rious responses, replies a nd sur-replies. For the reasons that follow, Power- One’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Power-One, Inc. (hereinafter “Power-One”) filed suit against Defendant Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter “Artesyn”) alleging infringement of multiple Power-One patents.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case