Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ciena Corporation v. Nortel Networks Inc et al, No. 2:05-cv-00014 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 25, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00014, Dkt. No. 192
Decided
April 25, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Court interprets the claim language in this case as set forth herein. Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table as Appendix B, the claims with the disputed terms in bold are set forth in Appendix …
Length
74 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The partie s d o no t disp ute the constru ction of an y ter ms in N ortel’s U .S. P atent N o. 5,608,733 or N ortel’s1 U.S. P atent N o. 6,084,69. T herefore, these patents a re no t ad dressed in this C laim Constru ction Opinio n. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION CIENA CORPORATION § § Plaintiff § § vs. § § NORTEL NETWORKS INC., § NORTEL NETWORKS CORP. § NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED § § Defendants § CASE NO.