Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ciena Corporation v. Nortel Networks Inc et al, No. 2:05-cv-00014 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2006)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00014, Dkt. No. 144
Decided
February 9, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and Order - granting #123 Nortel's renewed motion for leave to amend its pleadings to add defenses and counterclaims. Court amends the docket control order and extends the discovery deadline to May 3, 2006
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In accordance with the Court’s ruling from the bench at the hearing held on January 24, 2006, the Court GRANTS Defendant Nortel Networks Inc.’s (“Nortel”) Renewed Motion for Leave to Amend Its Pleadings to Add Defenses and Counterclaims on Inequitable Conduct (Docket No. 123). BACKGROUND In the present case, Ciena Corporation (“Ciena”) has asserted nine patents against Nortel, and Nortel has asserted thirteen patents against Ciena. The deadline for both parties to add inequitable conduct claims to their pleadings was June 14, 2005.