Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ciena Corporation v. Nortel Networks Inc et al, No. 2:05-cv-00014 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 1, 2005)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00014, Dkt. No. 85
Decided
September 1, 2005
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - granting Ciena's motion for leave to amend and denying deft's motion for leave to amend
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Ciena’s Unopposed Motion for L eave to Amend I ts Pleadings and Invalidity Contentions (Docket No. 68) and Nortel’s Motion for Leave to Amend Its Pleadings to Add Defenses and/or Counterclaims on Inequitable Conduct (Docket No. 73). Having considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court GRANTS Ciena’s motion and DENIES Nortel’s motion. BACKGROUND Ciena has asserted nine patents against Nortel, and Nortel has asserted thirteen of its own patents against Ciena.