Yasuo Kamatani, et al v. Benq Inc, No. 2:03-cv-00437 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2006)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Second Omnibus Motion for Sanctions (#192). For the reasons set out below, the Court denies Plaintiffs’ Motion as it relates to sanctions but carries with the case Plaintiffs’ request to find this an “exceptional” case. I. Introduction At the outset, the Court notes that Kamatani has filed numerous requests for sanctions in this case (the Court believes this represents the 4 request) and, due to the behavior of BenQ, thisth Court granted much of the relief Kamatani requested.