Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Yasuo Kamatani, et al v. Benq Inc, No. 2:03-cv-00437 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 4, 2005)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:03-cv-00437, Dkt. No. 174
Decided
October 4, 2005
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER as set forth herein
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction. In this patent infringement case, the plaintiffs, Yasuo Kamatani and Laserdynamics, Inc., sued the de fendants, BenQ Corporation and B enQ of America Corporation for infr ingement of United States Patent No. 5, 587,981. The patent-in-suit claims methods for discriminating between1 different types of optical disks inserted into an optical disk drive by reading total of contents data or processing an optical sig nal.