Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

The Ohio Willow Wood Company v. Thermo-Ply, Inc., No. 9:07-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2011)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:07-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 142
Decided
February 3, 2011
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 128 The Ohio Willow Wood Co and Thermo-Ply Inc's Joint Motion to Vacate
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DENYING JOINT MOTION TO VACATE Plaintiff The Ohio Willow Wood Company (“OWW”) filed suit against Defendant Thermo- Ply, Inc. alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,291,182 (“the ‘182 patent”). This court granted Thermo-Ply’s motion for summary judgment, holding that most of the claims of the ‘182 patent were invalid as obvious, and entered Final Judgment. Both parties appealed. As part of the Federal Circuit’s mediation program , the parties were1 ordered to pa rticipate in m andatory me diation.