Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

The Ohio Willow Wood Company v. Thermo-Ply, Inc., No. 9:07-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 4, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:07-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 122
Decided
February 4, 2010
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 112 Motion to declare this action exceptional and for award of attorney's fees
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES Plaintiff The Ohio Willow Wood Company (“OWW”), filed suit against Defendant Thermo-Ply, Inc. (“Thermo-Ply”) alleging infringement of forty-four claims of United States Patent No. 7,291,182. The ‘182 patent discloses prosthetic liners made from a fabric coated1 with gel or rubber that substantially conforms to an amputee’s residuum when worn. The court2 granted summary judgment in favor of Thermo-Ply on November 20, 2009, finding all asserted claims invalid as obvious. Doc. # 107.