Grantley Patent Holding Ltd. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc., No. 9:06-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2008)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT Plaintiff Grantley Patent Holdings, Ltd. moves for summary judgment on the inequitable conduct claims advanced by Defendants (collectively referred to as “Clear Channel”), arguing that Clear Channel has produced no evidence of materiality or intent to deceive. Inequitable conduct must be proven by clear and convincing evidence.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error