Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Grantley Patent Holding Ltd. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc., No. 9:06-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2008)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00259, Dkt. No. 172
Decided
March 31, 2008
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 97 Motion for Summary Judgment of no inequitable conduct
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT Plaintiff Grantley Patent Holdings, Ltd. moves for summary judgment on the inequitable conduct claims advanced by Defendants (collectively referred to as “Clear Channel”), arguing that Clear Channel has produced no evidence of materiality or intent to deceive. Inequitable conduct must be proven by clear and convincing evidence.