Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Grantley Patent Holding Ltd. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc., No. 9:06-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00259, Dkt. No. 91
Decided
January 8, 2008
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and Order construing claim terms of of US Patent Nos 6,061,691; 6/253/187; 6,567,824; and 6,920,464
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 6,061,691; 6,253,187; 6,567,824; AND 6,920,464 Plaintiff Grantley Patent Holdings, Ltd. (“Grantley”) filed suit against Defendants Clear Channel Communications, Inc.; Clear Channel Management Services, LP; Ackerley Broadcasting Fresno, Inc.; Ackerley Broadcasting Operations, LLC; AMFM Broadcasting, Inc.; Capstar Radio Operating Company; Citicasters Company; Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.; Jacor Broadcasting Corporation; and Jacor Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc.