Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al, No. 9:06-cv-00158 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00158, Dkt. No. 182
Decided
January 11, 2008
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER construing claim terms of U S Patent Nos. 6,222,525 and 6,906,700 - Part I
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 6,222,525 AND 6,906,700 - Part I Plaintiff Anascape, Ltd. (“Anascape”) filed suit against Defendants Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) and Nintendo of America, Inc. (“Nintendo”) and Microsoft claiming infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,222,525 (“the ‘525 patent”) and 6,906,700 (“the ‘700 patent”). The court1 conducted a Markman hearing to assist the court in interpreting the meaning of the disputed claim terms.