Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al, No. 9:06-cv-00158 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 30, 2007)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00158, Dkt. No. 159
Decided
November 30, 2007
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 5,999,084; 6,102,802; 6,135,886; AND 6,343,991
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 5,999,084; 6,102,802; 6,135,886; AND 6,343,991 Plaintiff Anascape, Ltd. (“Anascape”) filed suit against Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) claiming infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,999,084 (“the ‘084 patent”), 6,102,802 (“the ‘802 patent”), 6,135,886 (“the ‘886 patent”), and 6,343,991 (“the ‘991 patent”).