Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 6:18-cv-00388 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2019)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG (“Papst”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Samsung”) motions for post-trial relief. Having considered the parties’ written submissions and the arguments at the July 11, 2019 hearing, the Court rules as follows: • Samsung’s Motion to Contact Jurors (Docket No. 319) is DENIED; • Samsung’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial on Issues Related to Liability (Docket No.