Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, et al, No. 6:18-cv-00388 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 1, 2018)

Granted in Part
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:18-cv-00388, Dkt. No. 1
Decided
August 1, 2018
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER severing Claims 1 and 17 of the '449 patent from 6:15cv1095 into a new separate cause of action against Samsung, Lenovo and Motorola. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint against Samsung (Docket No. 21, 6:15-cv-1…
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Samsung”) Motion to Stay Case Pending Federal Circuit’s Appeals Or, Alternatively, Motion for Partial Stay an d Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary for Summary Judgment of Invalidity (Docket No. 708). Defendants Lenovo (United States) Inc. (“Lenovo”) and Motorola Mobility LLC (“Motorola”) joined the motion (Docket No. 710). For the reasons explains belo w, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART the motion to stay as to U.S. Patent Nos.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case