Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Diem LLC v. BigCommerce, Inc., No. 6:17-cv-00186 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 7, 2018)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:17-cv-00186, Dkt. No. 66
Decided
February 7, 2018
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER construing the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 7,770,122
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed cl aim terms in U.S. Patent No. 7,770,122 ( “the ’122 Patent ”). Plaintiff Diem LLC (“Diem” or “Plaintiff” ) alleges that Defendant BigCommerce, Inc. (“BigCommerce” or “Defendant” ) infringes the ’122 Patent. Plaintiff filed an opening claim construction brief (Doc. No. 56), to which Defendant filed a responsive brief (Doc. No. 59),1 and Plaintiff filed a reply (Doc. No. 62). The Parties additionally submitted a Joint Claim Constr uction Chart pursuant to P.R. 4-5(d). (Doc. No.