Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Diem LLC v. BigCommerce, Inc., No. 6:17-cv-00186 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:17-cv-00186, Dkt. No. 57
Decided
December 28, 2017
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 48 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue filed by BigCommerce, Inc
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant BigCommerce, Inc. ’s (“BigCommerce”) Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a). (Doc. No. 48.) Plaintiff Diem LLC (“Diem”) filed a response (Doc. No. 50) to which BigCommerce has filed a reply (Doc. No. 51). After considering the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES BigCommerce’s Motion to Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 48). BACKGROUND On March 27, 2017 , Diem filed this action against Defendant BigCommerce alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,770,122 (“the ’122 Patent”). (Doc. No.