Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. HTC Corporation et al, No. 6:16-cv-00363 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2015)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-00363, Dkt. No. 12
Decided
March 9, 2015
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
40 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

T his Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 6,819,923 (“the ’ 9923 Patent”), 6,810,019 (“the ’ 019 Patent”), 7,941,174 (“the ’ 174 Patent”), 8,055,820 (“the ’820 Patent”), and 7,218,923 (“the ’8923 Patent”), asserted in this suit by Plaintiff Cellular Communications Equipment LLC. Also before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness (Docket No. 287).