Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Acronis, Inc. et al, No. 6:15-cv-01001 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2019)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Acronis’s Opposed Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees and Costs (ECF 183). Having duly considered the motion, response (ECF 187), reply (ECF 191) and sur-reply (ECF 193), the motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (“Uniloc”) filed a Complaint for Patent Infringement against Defendant Acronis, Inc. (“Acronis”) on November 20, 2015. Uniloc also filed a case—Civil Action No. 6:15- cv-1003—against Defendant Chief Architect, I nc. (“Chief Architect”) and the cases were consolidated.