Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Acronis, Inc. et al, No. 6:15-cv-01001 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-01001, Dkt. No. 162
Decided
February 21, 2017
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER re: disputed claim terms in the U.S, Patent No. 7,024,696 (the 696 Patent)
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in the United States Patent No. 7,024,696 (“the ’696 Patent”). On January 26, 2017, the parties presented arguments on the disputed claim terms at the Markman hearing. Doc. No. 154. The Court resolves the claim term disputes as stated and for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND On November 20, 2015, Plaintiffs Uniloc Luxembour g S.A. and Uniloc USA, Inc. (collectively “Uniloc”) filed the lead action captioned above against Defendant Acronis, Inc.