Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Apple Inc. et al, No. 6:14-cv-00251 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:14-cv-00251, Dkt. No. 254
Decided
August 29, 2016
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the claim construction as set forth in this Order
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion resolves an additional claim construction dispute in United States Patent No. 8,055,820 (“the ‘820 Patent”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court resolves the dispute as stated. BACKGROUND On July 19, 2016 , Plaintiff Cellular Communications Eq uipment LLC (“CCE”) filed a Motion to Enforce Compliance with O2 Micro and to Resolve a Claim Construction Dispute That Defendants Intend to Argue to the Jury (Doc. No. 127). The Co urt heard argument on dispositive and Daubert Motions on August 22, 2016 .