Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Apple Inc. et al, No. 6:14-cv-00251 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Cellular Communications Equipment LLC ’s (“CCE”) Motion for Leave to Supplement Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions (“the Motion”). Case No. 6: 14-cv-251, Doc. No. 174; Case No. 6:13-cv-507, Doc. No. 5411. Having considered the Parties’ arguments and for the reasons stated herein, the Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. BACKGROUND CCE filed suit against Apple, Inc.