Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

EVM Systems, LLC v. Rex Medical, L.P. et al, No. 6:13-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2015)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00184, Dkt. No. 202
Decided
August 17, 2015
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants Motion to Exclude and Strike 111 is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff EVM Systems, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Anticipation, Non-obviousness, No Indefiniteness, No Lack of Written Description, and No Lack of Enablement (Docket No. 105) , Defendants Rex Medical, L.P. and Argon Medical Devices , Inc.’s Cross-Motion of Invalidity of the ’670 Patent for Indefiniteness and Lack of Written Description, and Response in Opposition to Plaintiff EVM Systems, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No.