Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

EVM Systems, LLC v. Rex Medical, L.P. et al, No. 6:13-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. June 4, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00184, Dkt. No. 61
Decided
June 4, 2014
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 8,052,670 (“the ’670 Patent”). BACKGROUND EVM Systems, LLC (“EVM”) alleges that Rex Medical, L.P. and Argon Medical Devices, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) infringe claims 1, 2, 4, 9, 10, and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 8,052,670 (“the ’670 Patent”). The ’670 Patent, titled “Medical Device with Slotted Memory Metal Tube,” relates to medical instruments made with shape memory tube that may be used during endoscopic procedures.