Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:12-cv-00878 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2015)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00878, Dkt. No. 303
Decided
April 16, 2015
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, and ORDER GRANTING 255 Opposed SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS filed by Motion Games, LLC
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Motion Games, LLC’s (“Motion Games”) Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend its P.R. 3-1 Infringement Contentions. (“MOTION”) (Doc. No. 255). Defendants1 filed a response (“RESPONSE”) ( Doc. No. 263), Motion Games filed a Reply ( “REPLY”) (Doc. No. 275), and Defendants filed a sur -reply (“SUR-REPLY”) (Doc. No. 280). Having fully considered the arguments before the Court and for the reasons set forth herein, Motion Games’ Motion f or Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions is GRANTED.