Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:12-cv-00878 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 16, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00878, Dkt. No. 225
Decided
October 16, 2014
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, ORDER DENYING 209 Opposed MOTION to Compel Defendant Nintendo Corporation, Ltd., to Produce Its Witnesses in the United States filed by Motion Games, LLC
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Motion Games , LLC’s (“Motion Games”) Motion to Compel Nintendo Corporation, Ltd. (“NCL”) to Produce Its Witnesses in the United States (Doc. No. 209) (“MOTION”). NCL filed a response in opposition to the motion (Doc. No. 217) (“RESPONSE”), Motion Games filed a reply (“REPLY”) (Doc. No. 219), and NCL filed a sur -reply (“SUR-REPLY”) (Doc. No. 222). Having considered the applicable law, the briefs by both parties, and the relevant evidence, the Court finds that Motion Games’ motion should be DENIED.