Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

EMG Technology, LLC v. Chrysler Group, LLC, No. 6:12-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. July 11, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00259, Dkt. No. 142
Decided
July 11, 2013
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, AND ORDER DENYING 125 SEALED MOTION MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY FOR INDEFINITENESS filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation, Google Inc., Expedia, Inc
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 125).1 Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s response (Doc. No. 128) and Defendants’ reply (Doc. No. 133) . Having considered the briefing and all relevan t papers and pleadings, the Court finds that Defendants’ motion (Doc. No. 125) should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND This is a patent infringement suit. Plaintiff alleges infringement of U.S. Patent No.