Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Adaptix, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. et al, No. 6:12-cv-00022 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 25, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00022, Dkt. No. 485
Decided
August 25, 2015
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER Denying 461 Notice of Additional Motion Brief to exclude Exhibit 119
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above case was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for pre-trial purposes in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. The following motion is before the Court: Adaptix’s Motion to Exclude Defendants’ Exhibit 119 (Docket Entry # 461). The Court, having reviewed the motion and the response, is of the opinion the motion should be DENIED. At the initial pretrial conference August 11, the Court heard argument regarding Adaptix’s objection to Defendant’s Exhibit 119, U.S. Patent No. 7,072,315 (the “‘315 patent”).