Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Adaptix, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. et al, No. 6:12-cv-00022 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2015)

Denied
Motion to Strike Daubert / Expert Challenges
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00022, Dkt. No. 480
Decided
August 24, 2015
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER Denying 463 Opposed SEALED MOTION to Strike Green's Supplemental Expert Report filed by AT&T Mobility LLC, Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Cellco Partnership
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above case was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for pre-trial purposes in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. The following motion is before the Court: Defendants’ Motion to Strike Mr. Philip Green’s Supplemental Expert Report (Docket Entry # 463). The Court, having reviewed the motion and the response, is of the opinion the motion should be DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case